![\"image\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/image-90.jpeg?resize=600%2C400\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Do Opera Mundi<\/p>\n
Os fil\u00f3sofos alem\u00e3es J\u00fcrgen Habermas, Axel Honneth e Rainer Forst, a fil\u00f3sofa norte-americana Nancy Fraser e o fil\u00f3sofo canadense Charles Taylor est\u00e3o entre os intelectuais que assinaram um manifesto internacional de rep\u00fadio ao que classificam como \u201cgolpe branco\u201d contra a democracia brasileira.<\/p>\n
O documento diz que a oposi\u00e7\u00e3o, formada por partidos de direita, aproveitou-se da crise econ\u00f4mica para levar adiante uma campanha \u201cviolenta\u201d contra um governo eleito democraticamente.<\/p>\n
O texto diz ainda que o objetivo do impeachment da presidente Dilma Rousseff \u00e9 atacar direitos sociais, desregulamentar a economia e frear as investiga\u00e7\u00f5es de corrup\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n
O manifesto foi lan\u00e7ado pela professora de \u00c9tica e Filosofia Pol\u00edtica do Departamento de Filosofia da Unicamp Yara Frateschi e pela professora de Filosofia da UFABC Miriam Madureira. Apresentado pela primeira vez durante a Confer\u00eancia Internacional de Filosofia e Ci\u00eancias Sociais em Praga, na Rep\u00fablica Tcheca em maio, o documento ganhou rapidamente o apoio de intelectuais de v\u00e1rios pa\u00edses. At\u00e9 o in\u00edcio da semana, mais de cem intelectuais de v\u00e1rias institui\u00e7\u00f5es haviam assinado o texto.<\/p>\n
Em outro documento, com mais de mil assinaturas, artistas e intelectuais estrangeiros tamb\u00e9m manifestaram solidariedade ao Brasil. O texto diz que os movimentos sociais \u201cest\u00e3o sujeitos a uma ofensiva pol\u00edtica de grande magnitude que leva o Brasil a um per\u00edodo de grande retrocesso democr\u00e1tico\u201d e obscuridade.<\/p>\n
O manifesto, em ingl\u00eas:<\/p>\n
IN DEFENSE OF THE DEMOCRATIC RULE OF LAW IN BRAZIL<\/p>\n
On the 31st of March 1964, a coup d\u2019\u00e9tat installed a civil-military dictatorship in Brazil, inaugurating a dark 21-year period of suspension of civil and political guarantees. Today, 52 years after, the Brazilian people face once more a break of the democratic order. As a result of the acceptance by the Senate of an impeachment process based on accounting irregularities, Dilma Rousseff, who had been elected in 2014 for a mandate of 4 years, was forced, on the 12th of May 2016, to stand down as President of the Republic. Even though this removal is supposed to be temporary, lasting up to 180 days, period during which the senators should reconvene to evaluate the motives that have resulted in the impeachment process, it is unlikely that Dilma should return to office.<\/p>\n
Dilma Rousseff\u2019s temporary removal from office is the culmination of a process characterised by unprecedented arbitrariness and polarisation in democratic Brazilian society, perceptible at least since her re-election in 2014. By attributing the recent corruption scandals exclusively to the Worker\u2019s Party\u2019s (PT) administrations (although they were the only ones who had the courage to investigate them through, even when investigations turned against their own) and by manipulating public opinion against the supposed risks of a left-wing takeover of the country, the right-wing opposition to Dilma Rousseff\u2019s government took advantage of the economic crisis that emerged after years of stability and growth and led a violent media campaign against it. It managed to aggregate against the Workers\u2019 Party (PT) and Lula\u2019s and Dilma\u2019s governments large sections of business elites and conservative middles classes, as well as authoritarian sectors represented in Congress and in the Judiciary, evidently aiming the hammering down of the social rights secured by Dilma\u2019s government and the deregulation of economy. Besides, once in power, they will probably decline to further investigate corruption as it is likely to involve their own people, as opposed to Dilma Rousseff, whose probity in the administration of public affairs is not doubted, as corruption charges are not part of the impeachment process.<\/p>\n
The impeachment is a juridical tool of extremely restricted scope in Brazilian presidentialism. It is regulated by Art.85 of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, and its use is restricted to cases involving serious offenses (crimes de responsabilidade, \u201cresponsibility crimes\u201d) carried out by the President. As the accounting irregularities in the administration of public funds that Dilma Rousseff is accused of are not serious offenses in the sense prescribed by the Constitution, it is evident that this impeachment is not legitimately grounded. Furthermore, the whole process was full of questionable aspects, which contribute to add further illegitimacy to its results. Therefore, it is not an exaggeration to consider the present impeachment process against Dilma Rousseff a white coup, which will yield long-lasting consequences to the democratic Rule of Law in Brazil.<\/p>\n
In the face of all this, we consider necessary to state our absolute repudiation of the illegitimate destitution of President Dilma Rousseff, and our strong support for the maintenance of the Rule of Law in Brazil.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Do Opera Mundi Os fil\u00f3sofos alem\u00e3es J\u00fcrgen Habermas, Axel Honneth e Rainer Forst, a fil\u00f3sofa norte-americana Nancy Fraser e o fil\u00f3sofo canadense Charles Taylor est\u00e3o entre os intelectuais que assinaram um manifesto internacional de rep\u00fadio ao que classificam como \u201cgolpe branco\u201d contra a democracia brasileira.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notas"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7wKYW-tE","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1838"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1838\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2128,"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1838\/revisions\/2128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blogdalucianaoliveira.com.br\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}